In a recent social media statement, former U.S. President Donald J. Trump expressed optimism about the possibility of a peace deal between long-time adversaries Iran and Israel. Drawing from his past diplomatic efforts, Trump suggested that a resolution could be achieved using the same strategic framework that he claims brought India and Pakistan closer to peace during his administration.
> “Iran and Israel should make a deal and they will, just like I got India and Pakistan to make one,” Trump stated in a post dated June 15, 2025. He added that such agreements could be facilitated through trade negotiations with the United States, which he claims were effective in fostering reason and cohesion in previous geopolitical conflicts.
A Broader Peace Vision
Trump's remarks emphasized his broader efforts in conflict resolution, both past and present. He referenced his role in defusing tensions between Serbia and Kosovo, as well as his interventions in the dispute between Egypt and Ethiopia over the Nile River dam project. In both cases, Trump claimed credit for bringing peace and stability through direct U.S. involvement.
> “There is peace, at least for now, because of my intervention, and it will stay that way,” he said regarding the Nile River issue.
Turning back to the Middle East, Trump mentioned that there are “many calls and meetings now taking place” and that serious discussions are underway to initiate diplomatic progress between Iran and Israel.
> “Likewise, we will have PEACE, soon, between Israel and Iran!” he declared with characteristic confidence.
Frustration Over Lack of Recognition
Despite outlining a list of international efforts he spearheaded, Trump voiced frustration over what he perceives as a lack of acknowledgment for his achievements in global diplomacy.
> “I do a lot, and never get credit for anything, but that’s OK, the PEOPLE understand,” he wrote.
This sense of underappreciation was echoed in a translated quote widely shared in Indonesian media:
> “Saya melakukan banyak hal, tapi tidak pernah mendapat pengakuan apa pun.”
(“I do a lot, but I never get recognition for anything.”)
Can Trade Be a Tool for Peace?
Trump’s statement revives a longstanding geopolitical question: Can trade serve as a tool for conflict resolution? His administration was known for leveraging economic incentives and penalties to influence global behavior a strategy that received both praise and criticism.
By invoking the India-Pakistan example, Trump underscores his belief that economic cooperation can foster political breakthroughs, even among deeply divided nations. While many analysts remain skeptical about the feasibility of a near-term Iran-Israel accord, the notion of leveraging trade to build diplomatic bridges is not new and it’s one Trump is clearly eager to champion again.
Conclusion
Although Trump is no longer in office, his rhetoric suggests a continued interest in influencing international affairs, particularly in volatile regions like the Middle East. His claim to have facilitated peace in various global hotspots is part of a broader narrative that seeks to position him as a capable dealmaker one who could once again lead or influence global diplomacy, potentially in a future political role.
Whether Iran and Israel move toward peace remains uncertain, but Trump’s comments have certainly reignited conversation around the potential for non-traditional diplomatic strategies particularly those centered around trade to resolve seemingly intractable conflicts.